Thankfully, this is not a post about holding on, although God knows, I need to. Changes in my non-author life are making waves again, but that’s just how it is.
Onwards.
I saw a post or blog, or note somewhere a little while ago, and with the launch of the Knitted Knomes, the thought came up again.
The poster supposed that a writer should buy their own book – this is a reasonable argument to make, since we live in a world where we expect people to stand by their product, and show how much faith they have in it, that they have one themselves.
On the other hand, anything you make yourself, you’re doing it for the love of thing (hopefully), and you get to keep it at the end. You don’t have to buy the thing; you made it. If you sell it on, you can make another, or keep both.
I’m not saying the suggestion is wrong – but what I am saying is that the suggestion fails to take into into account several factors when talking about books. If you’re an Indie Author/Publisher, you’re likely working through Amazon. My figures are out of date, but at last count IIRC, Amazon sales/platform account for roughly 70-75% of Indie book sales, which is huge.
Amazon does not provide authors with free copies of their books, instead offering the option to purchase ‘Author Copies’ at printing cost. Considering that most (reasonably priced) books you’ll see actually return anything from ยฃ0.08 pence for a paperback to ยฃ1.74 for an e-book, you have to sell four books to cover the cost of buying a paperback copy for your own shelf. The only benefit is if you purchase your own e-book, you get a ‘refund’ on it, since you’re effectively paying yourself.
Consider this against Traditional Publication. Not only do you net a handsome advance (note to any Trad Pub submitters, have your MS finished pronto, because if you don’t get it done by the deadline, you have to pay it alllll back). Do you know what else you get?
Ten free copies of your book.
And they all go out to friends, family, your agent, the list goes on.
So: does an author have to buy their own book to expect others to do the same?
In my opinion, not really. Authors have poured that book out onto paper (or screen, or whatever) because it was already inside them, they already own it. I can still have conversations about my characters like they were people I knew for a lifetime.
Plus, no-one will ever know if I bought it anyway. Only I see the numbers. I suppose “pics or it didn’t happen” is a thing, but who is going to care? Besides, my book is in the store, I have no more to prove. Me buying the book isn’t going to sell it to you. That is what a cover is for. That is what blurb is for. That is what marketing is for.
That’s what the story is for. Buy books for what is in them, not for who buys them.
Having said all that, I do buy copies of my books, but the reasons I do so are more than just having faith in them (which I do).
So what do you think? Should authors buy their own books? If so why? There’s no wrong answer..!
Let me know, and as always, have a Great Day Adventurers. ๐